Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal
Articles Information
Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal, Vol.7, No.3, Sep. 2021, Pub. Date: Jul. 28, 2021
Genetic Variability and Heritability for Various Quantitative Traits in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Southern Highlands of Ethiopia
Pages: 64-71 Views: 816 Downloads: 143
Authors
[01] Temesgen Abo, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[02] Wassu Mohamed, School of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[03] Tesfahun Alemu, Holeta Agricultural Research Center (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abstract
In Ethiopia, field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is the major source of protein for resource poor farmers. The development of varieties for yield and disease resistance is one of the important activities to support farmers and improve the productivity of the crop. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess genetic variability and association among agronomic traits of field pea genotypes. Forty-nine field pea genotypes were evaluated in simple lattice design at Bekoji and Asasa in 2019 cropping season. Data collected for morpho-agronomic traits were subjected for analysis of variance. The analysis of variance showed significant differences among genotypes for most of the traits. The genotypes variations for grain yield in the range between 442.4 to 5148.3 kg ha-1. A total of 10 genotypes had higher grain yield than high yielding check variety, Bursa (3919.23 kg ha-1) of which EH 010011-3, EH 05048-5 and EK 08017-3 had 31.36, 10.69 and 10.38% yield advantages, respectively, over higher yielding check variety. The mean performance of genotype EH010011-3 was highest at Assasa and Bekoji with mean grain yield 5190 kg/ha and 4498 kg/ha respectively. Asasa was showed high environment mean yield (4028.9 kg/ha) compared to Bekoji (2866.6 kg/ha). The genotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 1.09% for days to maturity to 17.25% for grain yield, whereas the phenotypic coefficient of variation ranged from 1.23% for days to maturity to 21.67% for grain yield/ha. The estimated broad sense heritability ranged from 63% for grain yield to 94.0% for days to 50% flowering. Genetic advance as percent of mean ranged from 1.99% for days to maturity to 28.89% for total biomass. The study showed the existence of reasonable genetic variability among the field pea genotypes that could be exploited in breeding programs.
Keywords
Genetic Advance, Heritability, Pisum sativum, Traits, Variability
References
[01] Asfakun, S., Aminul, A. K. M., M. Golam, R., M., Abdul, K. M. and Jalal, U. A (2013). Genetic variability in advanced generations of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding 7 (2), 124-128.
[02] Asfaw Telaye, Beyene Demtsu and Tesfaye Getachew (1994). Genetics and breeding of field pea. In cool-season Food Legumes of Ethiopia, Asfaw, T. (Ed). ICARDA. Alepo, Syria, PP: 122-137.
[03] Benti O (2019). Comparing Yield Performance and Morpho-agronomic Characters of Landraces and Released Varieties of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) at Agarfa and Goro Woredas, Bale Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics. D Vol. 7, No. 3, 2019, pp. 34-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20190703.11.
[04] Benti O. and Yohannis P (2017). “Genetic Variability and Association AmongAgronomic Characters in Selected Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes at Bale Zone, Sinana Research Center, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.” International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 5 (6): 63–75.
[05] Blen W (2017). Phenotypic Diversity and Mineral Contents of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Accessions from North Wollo and South Tigray, and Improved / Introduction Varieties. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[06] Brijendra, K., Adesh Kumar, Ashutosh, K. S. and Roopa Lavanya, G (2013). Selection strategy for seed yield and maturity in field pea (Pisum sativum L. arvense). Global J. of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Breeding, 1 (1): 129-133.
[07] CSA, (2019). Agricultural sample survey. Report on area and production of major crops, Volume I. Addis Ababa, Pp. 14.
[08] Dawit Tadasse, Asfaw Telaye and Geletu Bejiga (1994). Genetic resource in Ethiopia, In: Asfaw Tlaye, Geletu Bejiga, Saxena, M. C. and Solh, M. B. (eds), Cool Season Food Legume of Ethiopia. Proceeding of the first national cool season legume review conference, 16-20 December 1993, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, ICARDA, Syria, pp. 79-96.
[09] Davies D. R (1976). Peas. In: Simmonds N. W. (ed.), Evolution of crop plants Longman, London, pp. 172–174.
[10] Deshmukh SN, Basu MS, Reddy PS (1986). Genetic variability, character association and path coefficient analysis of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 56: 515-518.
[11] Duke, J. A (1981). Hand Book of Legumes of World Economic Importance. Plenums press New York. pp. 199-265.
[12] Gemechu K. and Seid A (2016). Genetic options for combating biotic stresses in cool-season food legumes, Indian J. Genet., 76 (4): 437-450 (2016) DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00062.
[13] Habtamu S. and Million F (2013). Multivariate analysis of some Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5 (6): 78-87.
[14] Haddis Yirga and Dargie Tsegay (2013). Characterization of dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) accessions by qualitative traits in the highlands of Southern Tigray, Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 7 (10): pp. 482–487.
[15] Hagedorn, D. J (1991). Handbook of Pea Diseases. Report No. A1167. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension.
[16] Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. P. and Comstock, R. E. 1955a. Estimate of genotypic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 47: 314-318.
[17] Kedir Y (2020). Diversity Analysis and Identification of Promising Powdery Mildew Resistance Genotypes in Field Pea (Pisum sativumL.). American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 7-16.
[18] Kumar, A, Jain, B. P (2003). Genetic variability in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Research Birsa Agricultural University, 15 (1): 55-59.
[19] Legesse (2015). “Genetic Variability and Association of Characters for Yield and Yield Components in Some Field Pea (Pisum Sativum L.) Genotypes Grown in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia.” MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[20] McPhee, K (2003). Dry pea production and breeding, a mini-review. Food Agricultural Environment (1): 64-69.
[21] Million F (2012). Variability, Heritability and Associations of Some Morpho-agronomic Traits in Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 15 (8): 358-366.
[22] Santalla, M., Amurrio, J. M. and de Ron, A. M (2001). Food and Food potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetal pea germplasm. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 81: 601-610.
[23] Sorphi, S. P. S., Yadav, R. and Malik, S (2006). Genetic variability, correlations and path analysis for seed yield and its component characters in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Arch., 6 (2): 737-740.
[24] Srivastava, Saurabh, Roopa Lavanya, and G. M. Lal (2017). “Genetic Variability and Character Association for Seed Yield in Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.).” Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6 (4): 748–50.
[25] Tamene TT (2017). Genetic Variation, Heritability, and Advances from Selection in Elite Breeding Materials of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J. 8 (4): 555744. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.08.555744.
[26] Tezera W (2000). Genotype x Environment interaction in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) for yield and other traits across central and and Southern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia.
[27] Zohary, D. and Hopf, M (2002). Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Third Edition. Oxford University Press Inc. New York.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.