Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal
Articles Information
Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal, Vol.7, No.3, Sep. 2021, Pub. Date: Jul. 26, 2021
Effects of Animal Wastes from Cow, Goat and Poultry on the Growth and Yield of Selected Soybean Varieties
Pages: 57-63 Views: 822 Downloads: 139
Authors
[01] Olasan Joseph Olalekan, Plant Science and Biotechnology Unit, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
[02] Aguoru Celestine Uzoma, Plant Science and Biotechnology Unit, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
[03] Ekeruo Godspower Chibuike, Plant Science and Biotechnology Unit, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
[04] Ani Ndidiamaka Juliana, Plant Science and Biotechnology Unit, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
[05] Azande Wueseter Christian, Plant Science and Biotechnology Unit, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Abstract
A study on the comparative effects of organic sources of manure as well as inorganic fertilizer on the performances of selected soybean varieties was undertaken. The experimental set up was a completely randomized design (a 17 x 3 factorial treatment structures) consisting of 17 treatments combination and 3 Soybean varieties, replicated twice. Significant variety effect was observed on plant height two weeks after treatment (2WAT), days to flowering, plant height 5WAT, number of stem, stem circumference, leaf length, plant spread, number of leaves, number of pods and pod length. The effect of fertilizer type on growth and yield of soybean was found to significantly influence stem circumference and number of leaves. The interaction of variety x fertilizer type was found to only produce significant effect in the number of leaves and number of pods in soybean. The mean performance of the three different soybean varieties applied with organic and inorganic fertilizers revealed that variety TGx-1448-2E produced longer plant spread (34.28 cm), followed by variety TGx-1955-4E (31.69 cm) and then variety TGx-1904-6F (31.69 cm). The average number of pods (13.38 pods) obtained for variety TGx-1955-4E was more and significantly higher than the reduced number of pods counted for varieties TGx-1904-6F and TGx-1448-2E with an average of 9.79 pods and 10.43 pods respectively. Pod length of variety TGx-1904-6F was longer (3.69 cm), significantly more than pod length of 3.30 cm and 2.73 cm measured for varieties TGx-1955-4E and TGx-1448-2E respectively. The main effect of fertilizer type on growth and yield of different soybean varieties showed that fertilizer combination of poultry litter + goat dung at 7.5g had significantly high stem circumference (2.41 cm) and number of leaves (48.00 leaves). Interaction effect of variety x fertilizer showed that the application of poultry litter +goat dung fertilizer combination at the rate of 7.5g produced the highest number of leaves in TGx-1448-2E variety (59.00 leaves). Also, application of cow dung + poultry litter + goat dung at the rate of 5g gave higher number of pods (22.00 pods) for variety TGx-1955-4E. The findings of this study shows the response of TGx-1955-4E soybean variety to increasing number of pods with the use of organic manure combinations (particularly cow dung + poultry litter + goat dung at the rate of 5g and 7.5g as well as poultry litter + goat dung manure combinations at 7.5g rate), will be advantageous in increasing yield.
Keywords
Soybean, Animal Waste, Growth, Yield
References
[01] Shurtleff, W. and Aoyagi, A. (2007). The Soybean plants: Botany, Nomenclature, Taxonomy, Domestication and Dissemination. Soy info center. California. 40.
[02] Mathu, R. W., Nandokha, T., Riungu, T. C., Matere, S. and Bendera, N. K. (2010). The potential of soybean to increase agricultural productivity in dry areas of central kenya. In L. A. Wasilwa, J. Ouda, I. W. Kariuki, N. S. Mangale and M. N. Lukuyu (Eds), Transforming Agriculture for Improved Livelihoods through Agricultural ProductValue Chain. Proceedings of the 12th KARI Biennial Scientific Conference. November.
[03] Tefera, H. (2010). Breeding for promisscous Soybeans at IITA. Soybean molecular aspects of Breeding. Sudaric, A. (Ed), ISBN: 978-953-307-240-1, In; Tech Available from; http://www.intechopen.com/books/Soybean-molecular-aspects of breeding/breeding-for-promiscous-soybean-at iita.
[04] Singh, B. B., Ajeigbe, H. A., Tarawali, S. A., Fernandez-Rivera, S., Abubakar, M. (2003). Improving the prductin and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Fied crop. Res., 84 (1-2): 169-17.
[05] Fekadu, G., Hussein, M. and Getinet A. (2009). Genotype and Environment Interactions and Stability of soybean for grain yield and nutrition quality. African Crop Science, 17 (2): 87-99.
[06] Alghamdi. S. S. (2004). Yield Stability of some genotypes across diverse environment Pakistan Journal of Biology, (12), 2109-2114.
[07] Graham, P. H. and Vance, C. P. (2003). Legumes; importance and constraints to greater Use. Plant Physiology, 131: 872-877.
[08] Kumar, R., Kamra, D. N., Neeta, Agarwal. and Chaudhary, L. C., (2007). In vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of feeds containing oil seed cakes with rumen liquor of buffalo. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 20 (8): 1196-1200.
[09] Plahar, W. A. (2006). Overview of the Soybean Industry in Ghana. CSIR- food research Institute, P. O. BOX. M20. Acra, Ghana. Workshop on Soybean Protein for human nutrition and health.www.csir.org.gh/fri.html. plains Online. Crop Management 10.1094/cm-2004-0301-04-RV.
[10] Kanyanjua, S. M. Ireri, wambua, and Nandwa. S. M. (2002). Acidic soil in kenya: constraints and remedial options. KARI Technical Note NO 11. Nairobi, Kenya.
[11] kimani S. Gachengo C, palm C. A., Delve R. J (2004). Maize production on the central highlands of Kenya using cattle manures cmbined with modest amounts of mineral fertilizer. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences., 9 (1): 480-490.
[12] Njeru, P. N. M. (2009). The effects push pull management and different fertilization Strategies on maize crop yield in central kenya. MSc Thesis. Uppsala.
[13] Chen, X. X.; Liu, Y. M.; Zhao, Q. Y.; Cao, W. Q.; Chen, X. P.; Zou, C. Q. Health risk assessment associated with heavy metal accumulation in wheat after long-term phosphorus fertilizer application. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114348.
[14] Morris, M., V. A. Kelly, R. J. Kopicki and D. Byerlee. (2007). Fertilizer Use in African Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Good Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
[15] Oliveira et al. (2009) Oliveira C, Alves V, Marriel I, Gomes E, Scotti M, Carneiro N, Guimaraes C, Schaffert R, Sá N. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizosphere of maize cultivated in an oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado Biome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2009; 41: 1782–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.012.
[16] Albiach, R., Canet, R., Pomares, F., Ingelmo, F., 2000. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. Biores. Technol. 75, 43–48.
[17] Sarwar, G., (2005). Use of compost for crop production in Pakistan. Okologieabd Umweltsicherung, 26/2005. Universitat Kassel, Fachgebiet Landschaftsokologie and Naturschutz, Witzenhausen, Germany.
[18] De Bruin, J. L. and Pedersen, P. (2009). Growth, Yield, and Yield Component Changes among Old and New Soybean Cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 101: 124–130.
[19] Homa, T., Hamid, R., Elyas, R. P. and Salman, D. (2012). Soybean Qualities Parameters, Seed Yield and its Components Response to Planting Dates and Density in the North of Iran. Life Science Journal. 9 (4).
[20] Shaahu A., Bello L. L., Vange, T. and Maga, J. T. (2014). Assessment of Yield and Yield Components of Some Improved Soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) Genotypes Using Performance Index. International Journal of Applied Research and Technology. 3 (3): 80–86.
[21] Mamia, A., Amin, A. K. M. R., Roy, T. S. and Faruk, G. M. (2018). Influence of Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Soybean. Agronomy Journal, Bangladesh, 21 (1): 77-81.
[22] Arshad, J. and Nasir, M. (2010). Growth, Nodulation and Yield Response of Soybean to Biofertilizers and Organic Manures. Plant Journal of Botany, 42 (2): 863-871.
[23] Singh, A. (2012). Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield of Soybean. Editor: V. Mere and A. K. Singh. Publisher: Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-659-47283-1.
[24] Abebe, Z. and Deressa, H. (2017). The Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Yield of two Contrasting Soybean Varieties and Residual Nutrient Effects on a Subsequent Finger Millet Crop.
[25] Gupta, V., Sharma, G. L., Sonakiya, V. K. and Tiwari, G. (2003). Impact of different levels of FYM and sulphur on morphological indices and productivity of soybean genotypes. JNKVV Research Journal, 37 (2): 76–78.
[26] Board, J. E., Kang, M. S. and Harville, B. G. (1999). Path Analyses of the Yield Formation Process for Late-Planted Soybean. Agronomy Journal, 91: 128–135.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.